Apart from its devastating impact on individuals and their families,
multiple sclerosis (MS) creates a huge economic burden for society by
mainly afflicting young adults in their most productive years. Although
effective strategies for symptom management and disease modifying
therapies have evolved, there exists no curative treatment yet.
Worldwide, MS prevalence parallels the distribution of the Lyme disease
pathogen Borrelia (B.) burgdorferi, and in America and Europe, the birth
excesses of those individuals who later in life develop MS exactly
mirror the seasonal distributions of Borrelia transmitting Ixodes ticks.
In addition to known acute infections, no other disease exhibits
equally marked epidemiological clusters by season and locality,
nurturing the hope that prevention might ultimately be attainable. As
minocycline, tinidazole and hydroxychloroquine are reportedly capable of
destroying both the spirochaetal and cystic L-form of B. burgdorferi
found in MS brains, there emerges also new hope for those already
afflicted. The immunomodulating anti-inflammatory potential of
minocycline and hydroxychloroquine may furthermore reduce the Jarisch
Herxheimer reaction triggered by decaying Borrelia at treatment
initiation. Even in those cases unrelated to B. burgdorferi, minocycline
is known for its beneficial effect on several factors considered to be
detrimental in MS. Patients receiving a combination of these
pharmaceuticals are thus expected to be cured or to have a longer period
of remission compared to untreated controls. Although the goal of this
rational, cost-effective and potentially curative treatment seems simple
enough, the importance of a scientifically sound approach cannot be
overemphasised. A randomised, prospective, double blinded trial is
necessary in patients from B. burgdorferi endemic areas with established
MS and/or Borrelia L-forms in their cerebrospinal fluid, and to yield
reasonable significance within due time, the groups must be large enough
and preferably taken together in a multi-centre study.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15617845
No comments:
Post a Comment